top of page

"White Fragility" book in public school libraries.



This shockingly racist book is in many public school libraries and students are free to check it out and read it. Why are Marxists always focused on race, racial groups, and "shades of skin color"? Marxists need to divide people into groups to accomplish their agenda, and they use race as one way to do this. They also know they have to start with the youngest people possible, and so they go after our kids and indoctrinate them with this racist garbage. This book is found in the following school districts in at least one of their school libraries according to their own online school library catalogs:


  • Richardson ISD

  • Denton ISD

  • Dallas ISD

  • McKinney ISD

  • Rockwall ISD

  • Garland ISD

  • Mesquite ISD

  • Wylie ISD

  • Arlington ISD

  • Grand Prairie ISD

  • San Antonio ISD

  • Austin ISD

  • Houston ISD

I would expect to find it in other school districts as well.


Let's take a look at some scanned pages from this book starting with the Author's Note called "Identity Politics" at the very beginning of the book. DiAngelo starts by addressing the problematic topic of multiracial people. Multiracial people do pose quite a challenge. What percentage of whiteness is enough to cause "White Fragility" after all? Marxists like to put people in definitive groups by race, gender, socioeconomic class, etc., so multiracial people really put them in a perplexing situation! The author concedes that being multiracial is "complicated".




The author is a self-admitted white "cisgender" female who has made big, big bucks selling her book to school districts and other woke entities, and she also makes a fortune giving presentations and speeches on her racist garbage. Here is an excerpt from the Washington Free Beacon article titled:






So why does a white female write a book about how all white people are racist? Follow the money! Of course, she is admired by the Marxists on the left because she champions their agenda.


Here is an excerpt from the Introduction of her book White Fragility where she explains the definitions of "racial stress", "white fragility", and the "pillars of whiteness" and she also explains her confusion about why white people get defensive when they are called racist:



She goes on to further explain the pillars of whiteness.


Here in Chapter 2 she explains her belief about the connection between racism and white supremacy, and she explains how and why people of color cannot possibly be racist.




And, sadly, she goes on with this garbage for many more pages of Chapter 2.


In Chapter 4, she explains how race shapes the lives of white people, mainly through a phenomenon called "white solidarity":




...and she continues with more of this gibberish.


In Chapter 6, she discusses anti-blackness and explains why "we need to discuss white people as a group". You see, we can lump all white people together and give them all the negative characteristic of being racist. If you are white, you are racist. It's as simple as that. Of course, giving an entire race of people a negative characteristic based on their race alone is the very definition of racism!




Chapter 7 is titled, "Racial Triggers for White People" in which she explains "common white responses". Does this book sound racist against white people yet?




Chapter 9 is titled "White Fragility in Action" where she lists assumptions and functions of white fragility. For example if a white person assumes "I am free of racism", the function of that assumption is to "silence the discussion about racism". Notice that the author is assuming some pretty big things herself, namely that all white people are racist! But white people DO NOT have permission to assume things about themselves. If you are white, no matter how well you THINK you know yourself, other people know who you really are and what you REALLY believe.




Later in this chapter, she continues.....


By now, you are probably wondering "Where do we go from here?", and that is conveniently the title of Chapter 12. The author describes how she, as a white person, has done the "continuous work of identifying her internalized superiority" and realized "how it may be manifesting itself". This was very difficult and continuous work, of course, but the reward was that she found it "incredibly liberating". She does make it clear that she cannot have a "sense that she has arrived" because this work never ends, obviously. She also realizes that " a positive white identity is an impossible goal". Imagine if someone said "a positive African-American identity is an impossible goal" or "a positive Latino identity is an impossible goal" or " a positive Asian identity is an impossible goal" etc. I can already hear the cries of "RACIST!"


Notice how she describes the "white culture" as "the racist culture in which I was born".



Why is this racist book in so many public schools? Kids do not need to read this garbage, and they definitely don't need to be pitted against each other so that they learn to distrust and even hate each other based only on the color of their skin. But, this is what the Marxists are doing because they know they have to start with the kids if they want to divide us against each other so they can gain more power. Lenin, their favorite Marxist said it best:




Get informed about what is in your public schools and get involved! We must save the kids from this racist indoctrination. Many people would consider this child abuse, especially against white kids.

Comments


bottom of page