Why are all the black kids sitting together in the cafeteria?
This is a book found in many secondary public school libraries including middle/junior high and high school libraries, and if you would like to know if it is in your school library you should research your library's online catalog of books. If you read the title of this blog and thought that it sounded racist, you are correct! This book is incredibly racist because it is part of Critical Race Theory that "isn't taught" in our schools. This book is a perfect example of how CRT makes kids distrust and hate each other, divides America, and serves to promote the agendas of the Marxists who are running our public schools.
In a book about CRT and racism, you would expect to find these subjects and themes:
reparative, restorative, or social justice
systemic racism
police brutality, de-funding the police
implicit bias
white supremacy
white privilege
our country was founded on slavery
"allies", "intersectionality", "community", "equity", "reconciliation","transformation", and other buzzwords of CRT
What I have found in researching many of these books is that some other subjects and themes are surfacing:
how public education and especially colleges/universities are being used and, indeed, should be used to further this agenda and indoctrinate young people
"LatinX" as the new preferred term to refer to Latinos and Hispanics (The Spanish language has masculine and feminine nouns ending in "o" or "a". Well, if someone is transgender and identifies as a female, would that person be a "Latina" or a "Latino"? This throws the gender theory agenda of the Marxists completely off, so they just circumvent that problem and call everyone "LatinX". This is also an attempt to destroy the Spanish language and their culture, divide children from their parents and grandparents, and assert the Marxists' control over everyone. Remember, if you want to control a culture you have to control the language.)
API to refer to Asian Pacific Islanders, MENA to refer to people of Middle Eastern/North African decent, BIPOC to refer to black and indigenous people of color
demonizing conservative leaders
historical accounts are incomplete or inaccurate and often tell only part of the story
calls to action, activism, "doing the work"
There are things you, as a white person, just don't know or realize and you cannot disagree with anything the CRT Theorists/Marxists say. THEY tell you what is right or wrong and what you really think.
We will look at some pages I have scanned from this book. Notice on the cover that this is the "Twentieth Anniversary Edition". CRT has been around for longer than most of us realize!
On page 56, the author ssuggests that Donald Trump is a racist and states that his voters were White Supremacists. Richard Spencer, a known Neo-Nazi and White Supremacist who was certainly not an authority on the Trump movement, would later vote for Biden and he tweeted a photo of his ballot on November 3 as proof.
The author says that most white people are not honest with themselves because IF THEY WERE then they would realize that there is white privilege that they benefit from. This is something that cannot be argued against. It is a FACT.
And now there is a NEW UNDERSTANDING of racism which is elusive. But, it's okay. The author will tell us what we should think about it.
Notice how she says that the author of the article about white privilege wrote that she could express opinions without them being labeled as the "White" viewpoint and without being discriminated against. However, the author of this book does EXACTLY THAT and writes about the opinions of white people and the "White" viewpoint throughout this entire book and labels it AS SUCH. Following the arguments in the article about white privilege, we can see that white people are discriminated against in this book!
On page 89, the author describes how guilty white people feel when they become aware of systemic racism. She claims that this is because white people were raised to believe in America as a meritocracy. If you work hard, you will succeed. But, that is not the truth! This country is systemically racist, and people of color cannot succeed here no matter how hard they work. But, ........what about Dr. Ben Carson, Rita Moreno, Roberto Clemente, Obama, Oprah Winfrey, Marco Rubio, and countless others? If this country were truly systemically racist, then NONE of them would have been able to succeed no matter how hard they worked.
Throughout the whole book, she talks about "White people". She talks about how most White people feel, what they think, how they are all racist. Isn't this racist? Attributing a negative characteristic to a whole group of people because of the color of their skin? Racism!!! Remember, the Marxists are the REAL racists. They focus on race, obsess about it, label people because of their race.
On this page, the author defines the difference between racism and racial prejudice. She also justifies her statement that only white people can be racist because they benefit from systemic racism and they enjoy "white superiority". And, she later takes the opportunity to throw men under the bus, of course, and states that all men are sexist because they all benefit from sexism. Do you see how the Marxist Critical Race Theorists divide people and cause tension between racial groups and genders? It is part of their agenda. They can't win if we are united.
Keep in mind that this book is in public school libraries being read by KIDS.
This chapter is called "The Development of White Identity". The author states in the book that she is "Black". So, let me get this straight. She knows about how white people develop their identity, but white people cannot know how black people or other "people of color" develop their identities. The author is a COLLEGE PROFESSOR, you see, and she has STUDIED how white people form their "white identity" so SHE KNOWS! In fact, at the bottom of the page, you can see the articles she wrote to help her colleagues teach about racial identity. ("Allies" is one of the CRT buzzwords!)
Notice the first question she asks her students in a class or workshop: "What is your class and ethnic background?" She doesn't waste any time dividing her students into groups, does she?
Marxists don't care if Latinos and Hispanics like to be called Latinx. The Marxists are in charge of the culture and language, remember?
I saw a video where a reporter asked a man where he came from, and the man replied, "Mexico". The reporter asked if he was offended when people in the United States called him "Mexican" The man looked confused and asked, "Why would I be offended if someone calls me Mexican? I'm from Mexico. I'm Mexican." NO SIR!!! The MARXISTS will tell you if you find it offensive or not!
This page is hilarious! The author lists all of the racial groups and their acronyms that the Marxists have decided on. She actually lists these a couple of times (see how they focus on race and racial groups?) and then confesses that she has a dilemma. How can she make all of her students from these various groups visible without "tokenizing" them? LOL!!!!! How about STOP TOKENIZING THEM by giving their racial group an acronym? How about TREAT EACH STUDENT AS A HUMAN BEING and stop trying to divide everyone into groups? What if a student were 1/2 Puerto Rican, 1/4 white, and 1/4 Asian? What would you do then? Try to make each racial group's experiences "visible" for that one student? Would the Latinx group experiences be more "visible" since this student is mostly Peurto Rican? The author would have a real dilemma then! See how ridiculous this becomes? The fact is, human beings don't fit neatly into boxes. This drives the Marxists crazy. It's pretty entertaining, really.
Yes, what do all of you mean????? CRT Theorists and Marxists will call this racial group "Latinx" no matter if they like it or not. I always love how the Marxists lump everyone into one "community" like when she says that they are the largest "community of color" in size. Venezuelans and Mexicans, for example, think very differently on average and their cultures are not exactly the same. Yet, the Marxists would have you believe that all Latinx people in their community of color think and feel the same way.
Why are the Marxists always so focused on color? They like to specifically describe the color of skin such as "honey maple" or "milk chocolate". You also find this quite a lot in children's CRT books and classroom lessons. The fact is, they are obsessed with color because it is a visual representation of being oppressed by whites who, according to them, have no color. They don't talk about a white person as having "peach ice cream" or "rice pudding" skin color.
Bias, equity, allies, reconciliation, transformation, justice, community,"built into the foundational governance structures of the nation" (systemic racism, in other words). We could play CRT BINGO on this page!
Notice at the second arrow, they mean THEIR version of accurate history. You see, THEY decide what is accurate. And when they want people of all racial, ethnic and ancestral backgrounds to tell their stories without fear, they don't mean that white people are included in that. White people have no ethnicity or culture according to the Marxists. My sixth grade students always told me that white people have no culture but everyone else does. Where are they learning this from?
#5 talks about justice and #6 talks about the "process" to foster "systemic change". Or course, this process is activism, protesting, etc. that will cause the "inevitable tensions" in #7.
The author is a psychologist and university professor. This is what college students are learning in college classrooms all over this country.
The Marxists know that they MUST indoctrinate the youth if they want to change this country, and colleges /universities are a great place for them to indoctrinate because their parents are typically not involved at all.
This is more about what colleges are teaching, and parents are very unaware of what is going on.
Here, the author is in a dilemma about what to call different racial groups. Notice what she says at the last arrow. She uses "Latinx" because it encompasses everyone including those who are transgender or gender-fluid. Well, there you go.
Also, notice the next sentence where she states that this term is favored by many young Latinx students. Could it be because they have been indoctrinated with this Marxist agenda since Kindergarten?!?!?
We need to get informed and get involved so we can save our kids!!!!
Comments